Mainframe security solutions are a collection of tools and practices, like access control and data encryption, used to protect powerful mainframe computer systems.
They are critical for enterprises because these systems process and store the most sensitive financial and personal data for industries like banking, insurance, and healthcare, making them a primary target for cyberattacks.
Executive Summary
As of July 2025, securing mainframe systems remains a top priority for any enterprise that relies on them. Mainframe security solutions are a combination of specialized software, robust processes, and security principles designed to protect these powerful systems. This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the essential strategies and tools.
- The Core Challenge: Mainframes in industries like banking, insurance, and healthcare process enormous volumes of the world's most sensitive financial and personal data. This makes them a high-value target for sophisticated cyberattacks and subject to strict regulatory compliance (e.g., PCI DSS, SOX, GDPR).
- Agentless Data Protection is a Critical Dealbreaker: Many security tools require installing software agents directly on the mainframe, a risky and expensive process that can destabilize legacy applications. Agentless solutions, such as DataStealth, operate in the network traffic flow to protect data without any code changes to the mainframe, directly addressing this common dealbreaker.
- Tokenization vs. Encryption: While both are vital, they solve different problems. Encryption is reversible and protects data at rest and in transit. Tokenization replaces sensitive data with an irreversible token, removing the original data from the system entirely.
- Choosing Your Stack: The right toolset depends on your environment. An IBM-only shop might lean on RACF and pervasive encryption, while a hybrid-cloud environment demands unified identity management with scalable data protection capabilities.
What is Mainframe Security? A Foundational Overview
Mainframe security refers to the strategies used to protect a mainframe computer, its operating system (like IBM's z/OS), and its software. But this is an incomplete definition. A more precise, strategically sound definition is required:
Mainframe security is the discipline of protecting the data that resides on the mainframe.
All other security controls – e.g., access management, activity monitoring, vulnerability scanning – are secondary. They are layers of the fortress wall, but the data is the crown jewel within. These systems are the processing and storage backbone for the world's most critical operations in finance, healthcare, and government. This concentration of sensitive information is precisely why mainframes are a prime target for sophisticated cyber threats.
Therefore, the principal challenge is not merely preventing unauthorized access, but ensuring that even if access controls fail, the data itself is intrinsically useless to an attacker. Without a robust, data-centric security strategy, organizations risk catastrophic financial loss, regulatory penalties, and irreversible reputational damage.
Core Categories of Mainframe Security Solutions
1. Data Protection: Tokenization and Encryption
Protecting data on mainframes presents a unique challenge. Sensitive information, such as credit card numbers or personal identification, often exists in cleartext. Modifying legacy mainframe applications to handle this data differently is risky and expensive.
Modern data protection strategies focus on securing this data without altering the mainframe's core code. This is achieved through an agentless approach, where a solution intercepts network traffic to and from the mainframe. This allows the protection system to secure data while still using native mainframe protocols and standard database protocols.
Key techniques for agentless mainframe data protection include:
- Tokenization: This is an advanced data protection method where sensitive data is replaced with a non-sensitive substitute, known as a token. The token has no mathematical relationship to the original value, which is stored securely, DataStealth is a leading solution that uses tokenization.
- Format Preservation: A critical feature of effective tokenization is preserving the data's original format. For instance, a tokenized credit card number can be generated to pass a Luhn algorithm check. This prevents mainframe applications from rejecting the tokenized data, ensuring business processes continue without disruption. This capability is a key differentiator when comparing tokenization solutions.
- Dynamic Data Masking (DDM): This technique protects data in real-time by obfuscating it based on user roles, such as during legacy terminal access sessions (TN3270). An authorized user might see the complete data, while a user with fewer permissions sees a masked version (e.g., XXX-XX-1234). DDM solutions like DataStealth integrate with Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems like Active Directory to enforce these policies.
- Controlled and Secure Replication: Data is frequently replicated from the mainframe to other systems for analytics or business intelligence. Data protection solutions can intercept these replication flows to enforce security policies while the data is in transit.
- This ensures that only de-identified or tokenized data is sent to downstream systems, minimizing risk.
- For maximum security, data can be re-tokenized – i.e., detokenized from the mainframe's vault and immediately re-tokenized into a separate vault associated with the target system. This practice ensures tokens from one environment are useless in another, preventing data leakage across security domains.
2. Access Control and Authentication
Access control ensures that users can only access the specific computer resources required for their roles. It is a foundational pillar of mainframe security.
- Primary Access Control Tools: On IBM's z/OS, the most common tool is the Resource Access Control Facility (RACF). RACF is IBM's native security product for controlling access to data and system resources. Widely used alternatives to RACF include Broadcom's CA ACF2 and CA Top Secret, which offer different features and administrative models.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): To defend against credential theft, MFA adds essential layers of security beyond a simple password. Both IBM Z Multi-Factor Authentication and BMC AMI Security are leading products that provide robust MFA capabilities for mainframe systems, integrating with modern authentication methods.
3. Audit, Monitoring, and SIEM Integration
Continuous monitoring of the mainframe is critical for detecting and responding to security threats in real time. Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems are central to this effort, as they aggregate and analyze security logs from the mainframe alongside data from across the enterprise.
- Real-time Monitoring Tools: IBM's zSecure suite helps automate security auditing and compliance checks on the mainframe. For real-time event monitoring, BMC AMI for Security can detect threats and forward alerts to SIEM platforms.
- SIEM Integration: The CorreLog SIEM Agent for z/OS is a specialized tool designed to send mainframe security events (from SMF records) directly to enterprise SIEMs like Splunk, IBM QRadar, or ArcSight. This integration is crucial for a unified view of enterprise security.
4. Vulnerability Management and System Hardening
Mainframe hardening is the process of configuring the system to be more secure by default. This involves disabling non-essential services and implementing the strictest possible security settings to minimize the system's attack surface.
- Configuration Auditing: IBM's zSecure Audit can continuously check if the mainframe's configuration complies with corporate policies and regulatory standards like those from NIST or DISA STIGs. BMC's AMI Command Center for Security allows administrators to manage and enforce security configurations across multiple mainframes consistently.
- Penetration Testing: A key part of vulnerability management is proactive testing. This involves authorized, simulated attacks on the mainframe to identify and remediate security weaknesses before malicious actors can exploit them.
5. Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Privileged access belongs to system administrators and other high-level users who have extensive permissions. These accounts are a primary target for attackers, as compromising a privileged account can lead to a catastrophic breach. PAM is a critical discipline for managing and securing these accounts.
- PAM Solutions: Products like BeyondTrust Privileged Access Management for z/OS allow organizations to control, monitor, and audit how privileged accounts are used. Within IBM RACF, access can also be restricted through role-based access control, limiting permissions to only what is necessary for a user's job.
6. Secure DevOps (DevSecOps) for Mainframes
DevSecOps is the practice of integrating security into every phase of the software development lifecycle. For mainframes, this ensures that new and updated applications are developed with security built-in, rather than bolted on as an afterthought.
- CI/CD Pipeline Tools: Tools such as Broadcom's CA Endevor and Compuware ISPW (from BMC) are source code management solutions that help automate the CI/CD pipeline on the mainframe.
- Automated Code Scanning (SAST): By integrating tools like SonarSource's SonarQube into the development workflow, organizations can automatically scan code for security vulnerabilities, catching potential issues early in the development process.
7. Compliance and Risk Management
Mainframes process data that is heavily regulated by standards like PCI DSS (payment cards), SOX (financial reporting), GDPR (personal data), and HIPAA (health information). Compliance tools automate the collection of audit data and generate reports to prove adherence to these rules.
- Data Activity Monitoring: Solutions like IBM Security Guardium for z/OS provide real-time data monitoring and auditing to help organizations meet these stringent compliance requirements.
- Automated Reporting: Automating compliance reporting not only saves significant time and resources but also helps ensure the organization remains continuously compliant, reducing the risk of fines and penalties.
Comparison Table of Mainframe Security Tools
Security Function |
Tool |
Vendor |
Key Features |
Best For |
Data Protection |
In-Line Data Tokenization |
DataStealth |
Agentless, in-line tokenization, format preservation, quantum-resistant. |
Organizations needing to protect sensitive data without installing agents or changing mainframe code – a key dealbreaker. |
Access Control |
Resource Access Control Facility (RACF) |
IBM |
Foundational z/OS security for authenticating users and authorizing access to resources. |
Enterprises with IBM-centric environments needing a native, core access control solution. |
Access Control |
CA ACF2 / CA Top Secret |
Broadcom |
Mature, widely-used alternatives to RACF with different administrative models. |
Companies seeking a non-IBM access control framework or specific features not in RACF. |
Multi-Factor Auth. |
IBM Z Multi-Factor Authentication |
IBM |
Native solution that integrates modern MFA protocols directly into the z/OS login process. |
Adding an extra layer of login security for compliance and zero-trust initiatives. |
Multi-Factor Auth. |
BMC AMI Security |
BMC |
Provides comprehensive MFA capabilities as part of a broader security suite. |
Organizations that want to integrate MFA within a unified security monitoring platform. |
Audit & Monitoring |
zSecure Suite |
IBM |
Automates security administration, auditing, and generates compliance reports. |
Teams needing to automate compliance checks against standards like NIST, STIG, and PCI DSS. |
Audit & Monitoring |
CorreLog SIEM Agent |
CorreLog |
Specifically sends mainframe security logs (SMF records) to third-party SIEMs. |
Integrating mainframe threat data into an existing enterprise SIEM like Splunk or QRadar. |
Data Encryption |
IBM Z Pervasive Encryption |
IBM |
Hardware-accelerated encryption of entire datasets at the system level with minimal overhead. |
Encrypting large volumes of data at rest and in-flight without application changes. |
Data Encryption |
Protegrity for Mainframe |
Protegrity |
Granular, application-level encryption for specific sensitive data fields or files. |
Protecting specific data elements like PII or financial records within a database. |
Vulnerability Mgmt. |
AMI Command Center for Security |
BMC |
Manages and enforces consistent security configurations across multiple LPARs. |
Maintaining and proving a hardened, secure configuration state across the enterprise. |
Privileged Access |
Privileged Access Management for z/OS |
BeyondTrust |
Controls, manages, and audits the use of administrator and other powerful user accounts. |
Securing the most powerful "keys to the kingdom" credentials to prevent misuse and breaches. |
Secure DevOps |
CA Endevor / Compuware ISPW |
Broadcom / BMC |
Source code management (SCM) tools that enable modern CI/CD pipelines on the mainframe. |
Integrating mainframe development into an automated, enterprise-wide DevSecOps process. |
Secure DevOps |
SonarQube |
SonarSource |
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) to find code vulnerabilities during development. |
Integrating automated security code analysis directly into the mainframe DevSecOps pipeline. |
Compliance |
IBM Security Guardium for z/OS |
IBM |
Real-time data activity monitoring (DAM) and auditing to help meet regulations. |
Proving compliance (e.g., PCI DSS, SOX) with detailed reports on who accessed what data, when. |
How to Choose the Right Security Stack for Your Mainframe
Selecting the right security stack is not about choosing a collection of tools. It is about making a single, foundational strategic decision first, and then selecting supporting tools that align with that strategy.
The primary decision is your data protection architecture.
Once you decide how you will neutralize your sensitive data, the choices for access control, monitoring, and compliance tools become clearer.
For IBM-Only Environments: The Fallacy of a Single-Vendor Strategy
Organizations with infrastructures built primarily around IBM mainframes often default to leveraging IBM’s native security ecosystem. While this ensures tight integration, it creates an often overlooked strategic vulnerability: a lack of true defense-in-depth at the data layer.
- The Encryption Blind Spot: Relying solely on IBM Z Pervasive Encryption is insufficient. While it is a powerful tool for encrypting data at rest, the data is still live and accessible on the system. An attacker who compromises a privileged credential can still access and exfiltrate fully decrypted, sensitive information.
- The Strategic Value of Dissimilar Controls: A core principle of defense-in-depth is using dissimilar mechanisms. An independent, agentless, best-of-breed data protection solution like DataStealth provides a layer of security that is architecturally separate from the mainframe's native controls. It operates on the network, not the z/OS, neutralizing data before it can be targeted by a compromised privileged account. This approach moves data protection "left of boom," de-risking the mainframe asset itself.
For Hybrid Cloud Use Cases
When your mainframe must connect to cloud services, a data-centric security strategy is the only viable option. Traditional mainframe-centric controls like RACF are operationally irrelevant once data is replicated to a cloud data lake.
- Protection Must Follow the Data: The core principle is that protection must be inextricably bound to the data itself. A solution like DataStealth that tokenizes data
before it leaves the mainframe for the cloud ensures it remains protected regardless of its location.
- Adopt a Zero Trust Model: This is a foundational principle for hybrid environments where no user or system is trusted by default. Every access request must be verified. Tokenization is the ultimate enabler of Zero Trust for data; the data is protected by default, and its value is only restored for explicitly authorized use cases.
For High-Compliance Industries (Finance, Healthcare, etc.)
For industries governed by PCI DSS, GDPR, and HIPAA, the security stack must be optimized for granular auditing and aggressive scope reduction.
- Prioritize Scope Reduction: Tokenization is the single most effective strategy for reducing compliance scope. For regulations like PCI DSS, removing live credit card numbers from the mainframe environment by replacing them with tokens can dramatically reduce the number of systems and controls that fall under the audit's purview, saving significant time and money.
- Find Where Your Data Lives: You cannot protect what you do not know you have. A tool that can scan the mainframe to find and classify sensitive data is the essential first step before any protection can be applied.
- Integrate with Enterprise SIEM: All mainframe security logs must be forwarded to a centralized SIEM to provide compliance officers with a complete view of security events across the entire organization.
For Scalable, Future-Proof Data Protection (Tokenization)
For organizations seeking to fundamentally de-risk their environments, vaulted tokenization is the most effective and scalable approach.
- How it Reduces Risk: Tokenization removes sensitive data from your systems, replacing it with a worthless substitute. This drastically reduces the impact of a data breach.
- Tokenization vs. Encryption: It is critical to understand the difference. Encryption is a mathematical process that can be reversed with a key. Vaulted tokenization severs the mathematical link between the token and the original data.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is RACF in mainframe security?
RACF (Resource Access Control Facility) is IBM's core software for controlling who can access mainframe resources. It identifies, authenticates, and authorizes users. However, RACF's function ends once access is granted. It cannot protect the data itself from a compromised but authorized user. This is why a separate data protection layer, such as tokenization, is essential for a complete security strategy.*
What are the main tools that support Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) on z/OS?
Several tools provide MFA on z/OS. The main ones include IBM Z Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), which is IBM's native solution. Competitors Broadcom (CA Advanced Authentication Mainframe) and BMC (AMI Security) also offer robust MFA products. Additionally, leading cloud identity providers like Okta can integrate with mainframe environments to enforce consistent MFA policies.
How is z/OS monitored for security threats?
z/OS is monitored by analyzing System Management Facilities (SMF) records, which log a wide range of system and security events. Tools like IBM's zSecure analyze these logs to detect suspicious activity and can send alerts to a SIEM system. This monitoring is critical for detecting potential breaches, but it is a reactive measure. A proactive data protection strategy like tokenization aims to make the data worthless before a threat is ever detected.*
Is it possible to run DevSecOps pipelines on mainframes?
Yes, modern DevSecOps practices are fully applicable to mainframe development. This involves integrating modern tooling to automate the software development lifecycle. Tools like Compuware ISPW (BMC) and CA Endevor (Broadcom) act as source code management systems that can connect with enterprise CI/CD tools like Git and Jenkins. Furthermore, static analysis tools like SonarQube can be integrated to automatically scan code for security vulnerabilities, making security a core part of the mainframe development process.
Conclusion: Start With Scalable Mainframe Security Solutions
You have seen the complex landscape of mainframe security. From foundational access controls like RACF to modern DevSecOps pipelines, each component serves a purpose in building a defense-in-depth strategy. But layering defenses only raises the castle walls. It does not change the fact that deep within your z/OS environment lies the ultimate prize for any attacker: live, sensitive, production data.
This reality places every enterprise at a critical architectural crossroads. The choice you make now will define your security posture, operational risk, and competitive resilience for the next decade.
Path A is the path of addition: Continuing to bolt on more monitoring, more agents, and more complex encryption protocols directly onto the mainframe. This traditional approach, while familiar, treats the symptom, not the disease. It inevitably increases the administrative burden, introduces performance overhead, and – most critically – carries the inherent risk of destabilizing the very legacy systems you seek to protect. Every new agent is a new point of failure.
Path B is the path of neutralization. This is a fundamental shift in strategy. Instead of building a more complex cage around the data, you surgically remove its value at the source. This is the strategic imperative behind agentless, in-line data tokenization.
By intercepting data in-flight – before it ever reaches the mainframe in a sensitive state – you achieve a level of security and operational elegance that agent-based solutions cannot match. Consider the strategic advantages:
- You fundamentally de-risk the asset. With format-preserving tokenization, the data residing on your mainframe has no mathematical link to the original value. To an attacker, it is worthless gibberish. This isn't just risk mitigation; it's risk elimination.
- You bypass the core operational danger. Because the solution is agentless, you make zero changes to the mainframe's code. There are no new MIPS cycles to consume, no system stability to worry about, and no risky software installation on your most critical platform. Implementation is simpler and safer.
- You future-proof your security. While standard encryption remains vulnerable to the looming threat of quantum computing, tokenization is inherently quantum-resistant. Adopting it now is a strategic defense against tomorrow's attacks.
The defining question for your organization is no longer if you should protect mainframe data, but how you will architect that protection. Will you continue to add complexity to a brittle fortress?
Or will you choose the more scalable, resilient, and forward-thinking path: neutralizing the threat by rendering your data useless to anyone but its authorized users, all without altering the heart of your enterprise IT? For organizations where security, stability, and scalability are non-negotiable, the choice is clear.
See how a large financial services firm secured its legacy mainframe without any risky code changes or agent installations.
Get the Case Study