August 22, 2025

MIN Read

The Ultimate Guide to Data Security Platforms (2025)

DataStealth Team

The Ultimate Guide to Data Security Platforms (2025)

‍

In an era where data breaches are becoming more sophisticated and costly, the question isn't if you need to protect your data, but how. With the rise of generative AI (GenAI), democratizing cyberattacks and privacy regulations tightening globally, businesses are struggling to find a foolproof way to guard their most valuable asset: information. If you feel overwhelmed by the fragmented landscape of security tools and constant alerts, you're not alone. This guide is here to cut through the noise.

Forrester defines a Data Security Platform (DSP) as a solution that delivers a holistic approach to securing data by understanding its sensitivity, providing visibility into risks, and implementing data-centric controls to enforce policies for access, use, and lifecycle management.

We'll break down everything you need to know about Data Security Platforms, from the essential features to look for to a head-to-head comparison of the top solutions on the market. By the end, you'll have a clear roadmap to choosing the right platform to defend your digital fortress. Ready to secure your data with confidence?

Let’s explore the best data security platforms.

‍

What is a Data Security Platform?

‍

A Data Security Platform (DSP) is a centralized, integrated suite of tools designed to protect your sensitive digital information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, alteration, or destruction. A DSP helps you define your data, dissect it to identify threats and usage patterns, and defend it with a combination of security controls.

Think of it like a high-tech security system for a modern museum. The museum has priceless artifacts (your data) stored in various rooms (servers, cloud storage, laptops). A comprehensive security platform doesn't just put a single lock on the front door. It installs:

Motion detectors (Threat Detection): Data and user activity monitoring to spot anomalies.
Security cameras (Visibility & Monitoring): Tools for data discovery and classification to know what you're protecting.
Access card readers (Access Control): Granular policies to enforce who can see and interact with specific data.
Reinforced display cases (Encryption): Technologies that strengthen the casing around the data.
Dummy artifacts (Tokenization): Technologies that make the data itself unusable if stolen.

‍

All these components feed back to a single command center, giving the security director a complete, real-time view of the entire museum, allowing them to spot and neutralize threats before a priceless artifact is ever touched.

‍

What are the benefits of using a Data Security Platform?

‍

Adopting an integrated platform offers significant advantages over juggling multiple point solutions. According to Forrester, security leaders implement DSPs to achieve several key business objectives:

Support and Sustain Compliance: DSPs are crucial for navigating complex privacy regulations like GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS and HIPAA. They help identify regulated data and enforce the necessary protection policies, which is increasingly important with the adoption of AI and generative AI that process sensitive information.
Adopt a Data-Centric Approach to Zero Trust: A DSP acts as a center of gravity for a Zero Trust security model, which assumes breaches are inevitable and focuses on protecting the data itself. This approach is vital for protecting intellectual property and other sensitive corporate data.
Align Controls to Mitigate Data Risks: A clear view of your platform's data landscape allows you to apply the right controls to address specific risks, whether they are risks to data (like a breach), from data (like toxic data combinations), or in data (like inaccuracies).

‍

What Features Should a Data Security Platform Have?

‍

When evaluating platforms, there are several non-negotiable features you should look for, which Forrester categorizes into the "Define, Dissect, and Defend" model:

Define Data (Data Discovery and Classification): The platform must be able to automatically find sensitive data – wherever it lives – and classify it based on its type and risk level (e.g., PII, financial data, intellectual property).
Defend Data (Data-Centric Controls): The platform needs a robust set of controls to enforce security policies. This should center on directly protecting the data through data tokenization, encryption, and/or masking.
Dissect Data (Monitoring and Analytics): It must monitor data and user activity to detect anomalies, analyze risks, and provide insights into how data is being used. This includes capabilities like Data Detection and Response (DDR) and User Behavior Analytics (UBA).

‍

How to Pick the Right Data Security Platform

‍

The DSP market is fragmented, with many vendors offering overlapping functionality. Choosing the right platform requires a clear understanding of your specific needs and priorities. Follow these steps to ensure you find the perfect fit.

Define Your Core Use Case: What is the primary problem you are trying to solve? As Forrester notes, the most common core use case is regulatory compliance. However, your focus might be on an extended use case like data loss prevention, database security, or insider risk management.
Identify Your Data Landscape: Are you protecting primarily unstructured data (files, emails) or structured data (databases)? Is your data on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment? Different platforms have different strengths in these areas.
Research Your Options: Use this guide and resources like Forrester and Gartner to create a shortlist of 2-3 vendors that excel in your primary use case.
Evaluate Key Functionality: Schedule demos and come prepared with a checklist of your "must-have" features based on the "Define, Dissect, Defend" model. Ask how each platform would handle a specific scenario relevant to your business, such as an employee trying to upload a sensitive file to a personal cloud drive.
Gather Feedback: Involve the end-users and administrators who will be working with the platform daily. Is it intuitive? Does it provide them with the information they need to do their jobs effectively?
Make Your Decision: Weigh the features, performance, user feedback, and total cost of ownership (including licensing, implementation, and training) to make your final, informed decision.

‍

The Best Data Security Platforms at a Glance

‍

The DSP market is a mature landscape, having grown from security technology giants, and now includes tech titans like Microsoft, as well as a host of specialized vendors.*

Platform	Data Protection Features	Deployment Options	Key Advantages	Limitations	Best For
DataStealth	• Data Tokenization • Dynamic Data Masking • Data Encryption • Automated Data Discovery & Classification • Policy-Based Access Controls (RBAC/ABAC) • Unified Policy Enforcement	Network Layer, In-Line Deployment.	• Frictionless, agentless, and no-code deployment for all data protection capabilities. • Data Discovery, Classification, and Tokenization can find, identify, and protect both structured and unstructured data. • Readily deployable in mainframe/legacy, on-prem, cloud, and hybrid environments. • Readily scalable across enterprise-sized data estates. • Directly reduces compliance scope across PCI DSS, Data Residency, HIPAA, etc. • White-glove managed service from planning, to deployment, to maintenance and upgrades.	–	• Enterprises in highly regulated industries (finance, retail, government, healthcare, etc) with vast data estates and complex environments, including -- but not limited to -- on-prem, hybrid, legacy (e.g., mainframe), and cloud. • Enterprises aiming to reduce compliance audit scope by removing sensitive data (e.g., payment account numbers) from their environments. • Enterprises working to meet complex data residency and sovereignty rules while leveraging the cloud, offshoring, remote teams, and third-party vendors. • Enterprises looking to protect their sensitive data in mainframe and other legacy environments that are suffering from limited support and escalating costs. • Enterprises aiming to find, identify, and protect all both structured and unstructured data across their entire data estate. • Enterprises working to protect their data as they adopt generative AI, SaaS, and other digital transformation initiatives.
Microsoft Purview	• Automated Data Discovery & Classification • Policy-Based Access Controls • Encryption • DLP • Unified Policy Enforcement	Cloud-Native, API-Based Integration for Microsoft 365 and Azure Ecosystems.	• Deepest integration with M365 and Azure ecosystems. • AI-driven unified compliance and rapid deployment. • Zero Trust alignment	• Poor Non-Microsoft Integration: Struggles to provide visibility and control in heterogeneous environments outside the Microsoft ecosystem. • Incomplete Data Protection: Fails to reliably classify or apply sensitivity labels to most unstructured data, leaving major security gaps. • Complex and Expensive Licensing: High costs are driven by an opaque licensing model that often requires premium E5 plans or add-ons. • Unintuitive and Immature: The platform is seen as complex to use and feels more like a rebranded data catalog than a mature security solution. • Hard Scalability Limits: Imposes fixed resource quotas on assets and scans, which can bottleneck performance at enterprise scale. • Ineffective Customer Support: Support is frequently described as slow and unhelpful for resolving complex deployment or technical issues.	• Large enterprises with a Microsoft-centric technology stack.
Thales CipherTrust	• Encryption • Tokenization • Dynamic & Static Masking • Automated Data Discovery & Classification • Policy-Based Access Controls • Key Management	Modular, Agentless Options	• Deep cryptographic expertise • Agentless deployment and flexible architecture • Deep HSM integration for enhanced hardware security. • Compliance automation	• Complex and Hard to Use: The platform has a steep learning curve and is complex to deploy and manage, requiring significant operational overhead. • High, Opaque Costs: Total cost of ownership is high due to an expensive and non-transparent modular licensing model. • Difficult Integrations: Integrating with non-Thales systems is often complex or unsupported, with limitations in multi-cloud environments. • Inaccurate Data Classification: Struggles with accurate data discovery, often failing to classify large portions of enterprise data correctly. • Performance Bottlenecks: Can suffer from performance degradation when scanning high volumes of data or managing keys at scale. • Challenging Legacy Migration: Upgrading from older Thales platforms like Vormetric is a resource-intensive and disruptive process. • Known Bugs and Issues: The platform is affected by ongoing product bugs and has deprecated support for some legacy integrations.	• Highly regulated, complex enterprises needing robust encryption, key management, and unified control across hybrid/multi-cloud -- especially finance, healthcare, government, critical infrastructure
IBM Guardium	• Data Discovery and Protection • Database Security and Monitoring • Unified Policy Enforcement • Tokenization • Encryption • Masking	Hybrid (Agent-Based and Agentless).	• Depth in database security • Vulnerability assessments • IBM security ecosystem integration • Quantum-safe cryptography	• Major Performance Impact: Monitoring agents (S-TAPs) cause significant CPU usage and performance degradation on production databases. • Extremely Complex: The platform is difficult to deploy, manage, and use, with a steep learning curve requiring dedicated experts. • Poor Modern Integration: Struggles with integration for non-IBM systems, cloud-native applications, and containerized (Kubernetes) workloads. • Inaccurate Data Discovery: Its data classification is often incomplete and inaccurate, leaving sensitive data exposed and creating compliance gaps. • High, Opaque Cost: Total cost of ownership is high due to complex, non-transparent, and expensive licensing. • Frequent Bugs and Vulnerabilities: The product suffers from regular technical bugs and security flaws that require constant patching. • Lags Behind Competitors: Is considered weaker than rivals in ease of use, breadth of cloud integrations, and advanced features.	• Large, regulated enterprises with complex, heterogeneous environments prioritizing compliance, database security, and operational resilience
Varonis	• Tokenization • Masking • Encryption • DLP • Automated Data Discovery & Classification	Requires Installing Collectors	• Automated remediation of data and access risks. • Deep data-centric user behavioral analytics (UEBA). • Strong incident response mechanisms	• High, Non-Transparent Cost: Total cost of ownership is high due to an expensive and opaque licensing model that scales quickly. • Complex to Manage: The platform is difficult to manage, featuring a complicated interface and a largely manual update process. • Immature Cloud Integration: Support for modern cloud, container, and serverless workloads is less mature than that of competitors. • Performance Bottlenecks: Suffers from slow performance and analytics when processing very large volumes of data. • Inaccurate Classification: Data classification is often unreliable, generating a high volume of false positives that require manual review. • Requires Excessive Permissions: Needs more access permissions than competitors to function, which can create internal security risks. • Lags Key Competitors: Is considered weaker than rivals in ease of use, breadth of cloud integrations, and cost-efficiency.	• Medium/large enterprises in regulated sectors needing granular access governance, automated remediation, deep data visibility, especially with significant unstructured data and hybrid environments
Satori	• Tokenization • Masking • Encryption • Automated Data Discovery & Classification • Policy-Based Access Controls	Agentless, Network Proxy	• Fast, agentless deployment for cloud data stores. • Self-service access workflows streamline data operations.	• Unproven at Scale: Lacks independent evidence of its performance, scalability, and support effectiveness in large, complex enterprise environments. • High, Opaque Cost: Operates on an expensive subscription model with little public transparency on pricing details. • Immature Technical Support: Coverage for modern workloads like Kubernetes and serverless is less mature than for traditional data stores. • Manual Integration: Cloud integrations often require significant manual configuration, increasing deployment complexity. • Lack of Transparency: Provides no public data or independent validation on the accuracy of its data classification engine. • Competitive Gaps: Trails competitors in deep ecosystem integration (e.g., Microsoft) and advanced data governance features.	• Cloud-native organizations, fast-growing SaaS/data-driven companies needing rapid, agentless data protection and compliance
Forcepoint	• Tokenization • Masking • Encryption • DLP • Automated Data Discovery & Classification	Cloud-Native, Endpoint Agents.	• AI-driven, risk-adaptive security policies. • Unified cloud platform for broad policy control.	• Complex and Difficult to Use: The platform has a steep learning curve and is complex to deploy and manage, often requiring specialized expertise. • High, Opaque Cost: Features a non-transparent pricing model and a high total cost of ownership when factoring in personnel and infrastructure. • Endpoint Performance Impact: Can cause performance degradation on endpoint devices, negatively impacting user productivity. • Manual Integration Setup: Integrating with third-party cloud and legacy systems often requires substantial manual configuration. • Unproven AI Accuracy: Lacks independent, transparent data on the real-world accuracy of its AI-driven classification, creating trust gaps. • Inconsistent Support: Customer support is reported as mixed, with some users experiencing slow response times for complex issues. • Immature Cloud-Native Support: Lags competitors in providing deep, mature support for modern workloads like containers and serverless.	• Enterprises seeking cloud-native, AI-driven automation, rapid deployment, and broad policy unification, including regulated industries and large distributed organizations
Trellix	• Masking • Encryption • DLP • Automated Data Discovery & Classification	Agent-Based for Both Endpoint and Network.	• Deep integration with XDR for threat response. • Advanced DLP with OCR for unstructured data.	• High Complexity: The platform has a steep learning curve, is difficult to deploy, and requires significant operational overhead to manage. • Poor Non-Windows Support: Offers limited compatibility and features for macOS and Linux, with reliability challenges outside of Windows. • High Rate of False Positives: Generates a large volume of alerts that require manual triage, leading to alert fatigue for security teams. • Endpoint Performance Impact: Can degrade performance on endpoint devices, especially during deep content inspection at scale. • Inconsistent Customer Support: Support is often criticized for slow response times and lengthy, repetitive troubleshooting cycles. • High, Opaque Cost: Total cost of ownership is high due to non-transparent pricing and a lack of free trials or freemium versions. • Complex Integrations: Integrating with non-standard cloud or legacy systems often requires significant manual configuration.	• Organizations prioritizing XDR-driven, cross-domain threat detection, especially with broad endpoint, network, and email security needs; large enterprises, financial, government, critical infrastructure
Protegrity	• Masking • Encryption and Vaultless Tokenization • Automated Data Discovery & Classification • In-Line Proxy • SDKs and APIs • Native Integration with Certain Cloud Platforms	• In-line proxy deployment • Broad cloud-native platform support • Scalable encryption and vaultless tokenization	• Severe Performance Bottlenecks: Creates major delays at scale, with data access sometimes taking weeks or months, hindering analytics and AI. • Significant Vendor Lock-In: Proprietary encryption and tokenization make migrating to other platforms extremely difficult and costly. • Weaker Data Governance: Its data classification and discovery features are less comprehensive than those of top competitors. • Security Concerns with Tokenization: Its vaultless tokenization method is criticized for having a larger attack surface and lacking robust audit trails. • Complex and Unintuitive: The platform has a steep learning curve, an unintuitive UI, and requires significant operational overhead. • High, Opaque Cost: Total cost of ownership is high due to non-transparent, usage-based pricing and significant hidden costs. • Challenging Modern Integration: Integrating with modern cloud-native and DevOps environments can be complex and require custom work.	• Large enterprises in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, retail, government) needing persistent, field-level data protection and broad cloud-native integration

‍

Detailed Review of Each DSP

‍

DataStealth

‍

Best For: Large, regulated enterprises with hybrid or multi-cloud environments that need to achieve rapid compliance with minimal business disruption.

‍

Key Features:

Frictionless, agentless, and no-code deployment model.
Patented and robust tokenization and dynamic data masking.
DNS-layer operation for "no disruption" protection.
Default data residency compliance.

‍

Why It’s Good:

DataStealth is the absolute leader for organizations that prioritize rapid, frictionless deployment and compliance. Its unique agentless approach operates at the network layer, allowing it to protect data across all environments without requiring any changes to applications or endpoints. This makes it unmatched for regulated industries that cannot afford business disruption and need strong, immediate data protection and residency compliance.

‍

Microsoft Purview

‍

Best For: Large, Microsoft-centric, cloud-first enterprises that are deeply invested in the M365 and Azure ecosystems.

‍

Key Features:

AI-driven automated data discovery and classification.
Deep integration with Microsoft Entra for policy-based access.
Unified compliance management with 368+ templates.
Agentless deployment within the Microsoft cloud environment.

‍

Why It’s Good

‍

Microsoft Purview is the best-in-class choice for organizations operating primarily within the Microsoft universe. It offers seamless, AI-driven compliance and rapid deployment that is deeply integrated with M365 and Azure. While it lacks the advanced masking and tokenization capabilities of other platforms for non-Microsoft data, its strength lies in providing a unified, cloud-native security and governance solution for Microsoft-centric enterprises.

‍

Drawbacks

‍

Microsoft Purview's primary drawback is its poor integration with anything outside the Microsoft ecosystem, making it unsuitable for heterogeneous environments. The platform struggles to reliably protect unstructured data, feels less mature than competitors, and imposes hard resource quotas that limit scalability. Finally, its total cost is high, driven by a complex and expensive licensing model that often requires premium E5 plans.

‍

Thales CipherTrust

‍

Best For: Highly regulated, complex enterprises (especially in finance and healthcare) that need robust encryption and centralized key management across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Deep cryptographic expertise with broad encryption and tokenization options.
Centralized key and secret management, including BYOK and HYOK.
Hardware Security Module (HSM) integration for enhanced security.
Flexible, agentless, and scalable architecture for unified policy enforcement.

‍

Why It’s Good

‍

Thales CipherTrust is a powerhouse for encryption, tokenization, and key management. It excels in providing organizations with granular, centralized control over their cryptographic keys and data protection policies across complex, hybrid environments. Its deep expertise and HSM integration make it the ideal choice for highly regulated industries that require the highest level of data security and compliance automation.

‍

Drawbacks

‍

Thales CipherTrust is hindered by its high complexity, requiring a steep learning curve and significant operational overhead to deploy and manage effectively. Integrating with non-Thales systems is often difficult, and the platform can suffer from performance bottlenecks when scanning large data volumes. Its high, opaque cost and the challenge of migrating from legacy Thales products are also significant concerns for enterprises.

‍

IBM Guardium

‍

Best For: Large, regulated enterprises with complex, heterogeneous IT environments that prioritize deep database security, compliance, and operational resilience.

‍

Key Features:

‍

AI-powered data discovery and classification with broad database support.
In-depth database security and vulnerability assessment.
Quantum-safe cryptography and advanced AI security modules.
Unified policy enforcement with deep integration into the IBM security ecosystem.

‍

Why It’s Good

‍

IBM Guardium offers an enterprise-grade, unified platform with unmatched depth in database security and compliance automation. While its deployment can be complex and require skilled staff, it provides a comprehensive suite of tools, including advanced analytics and quantum-safe cryptography, making it the most robust choice for large, regulated organizations with the resources to manage it.

‍

Drawbacks

‍

IBM Guardium's most critical drawback is the major performance impact its monitoring agents (S-TAPs) have on production databases, causing high CPU usage. The platform is also extremely complex to manage and suffers from poor integration with modern cloud-native and non-IBM environments. A high total cost of ownership and inaccurate data discovery further challenge its value proposition for some organizations.

‍

Varonis

‍

Best For: Medium to large enterprises in regulated sectors with significant unstructured data that need granular access governance and automated risk remediation.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Automated remediation of data and access risks.
Deep, data-centric User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA).
Highly accurate automated discovery and classification of data.
Unified SaaS platform with strong incident response and forensics.

‍

Why It’s Good

‍

Varonis is a leader in access governance and automated remediation, making it ideal for organizations looking to reduce their data risk and achieve a state of least privilege. Its powerful data-centric analytics provide deep visibility into user behavior, especially around unstructured data. While deployment can be complex, it delivers high value by actively fixing security issues, not just identifying them.

‍

Drawbacks

‍

Varonis is often criticized for its high total cost and a platform that is complex to manage, featuring a manual update process. Its integration with cloud-native workloads is less mature than competitors', and its classification engine can generate a high volume of false positives. Uniquely, it requires excessive access permissions to function, which can create an internal security risk.

‍

Satori

‍

Best For: Cloud-native, fast-growing, and data-driven companies (like SaaS and fintech) that need a rapid, agentless solution for data protection and compliance.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Agentless, out-of-band deployment with no code or API changes.
Dynamic data masking and tokenization for cloud data stores.
Self-service access workflows and a personal data portal for users.
Fast time-to-value for achieving compliance in modern environments.

‍

Why It’s Good

‍

Satori excels at providing simple, rapid, and effective data security for modern, cloud-focused organizations. Its agentless deployment model means it can be implemented quickly to provide immediate value for data access control, masking, and compliance. It is the best choice for companies that need to move fast and want to simplify data security without the overhead of traditional solutions.

‍

Drawbacks

‍

Satori's primary drawback is its relative immaturity and unproven performance at a large enterprise scale, with little independent validation. Its support for Kubernetes and serverless workloads is less mature, and integrations often require significant manual configuration. The platform also has a high, non-transparent cost, and lacks public data on the accuracy of its classification engine.

‍

Forcepoint

‍

Best For: Distributed, cloud-first enterprises seeking an AI-driven, automated platform for broad policy unification and real-time risk remediation.

‍

Key Features:

‍

"AI Mesh" technology for proactive risk management and classification.
Risk-Adaptive Protection that dynamically adjusts policies based on user behavior.
Unified operational model for policy enforcement across all channels.
Enterprise-wide Data Loss Prevention (DLP), tokenization, and encryption.

‍

Why It’s Good

‍

Forcepoint stands out for its AI-driven, cloud-native approach to data security. Its platform is designed for operational efficiency, offering a unified way to manage policies across an entire organization. The innovative Risk-Adaptive Protection feature allows for dynamic, real-time responses to emerging threats, making it a strong choice for distributed enterprises that need automated and proactive security.

‍

Drawbacks

‍

Forcepoint is hindered by its complexity, a steep learning curve, and the performance degradation it can cause on endpoint devices. Integrations often require substantial manual setup, and there is a lack of independent proof to validate the accuracy of its AI-driven classification. Finally, a high total cost and inconsistent customer support are frequently cited concerns.

‍

Trellix

‍

Best For: Organizations with complex security estates that prioritize XDR-driven, cross-domain threat detection, especially those with broad endpoint, network, and email security needs.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Deep integration with XDR for unified threat response.
Advanced Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with Optical Character Recognition (OCR).
Automated discovery and classification across a broad range of file formats.
Unified and open security platform for cross-domain security.

‍

Why It’s Good

‍

Trellix's strength lies in its XDR-driven approach, which integrates data security with broader threat detection and response. This makes it a powerful choice for organizations that need to correlate data loss events with other security signals from across their IT environment. Its advanced DLP capabilities provide robust protection, particularly for large enterprises with complex security needs.

‍

Drawbacks

‍

Trellix's main weakness is its poor support for non-Windows operating systems like macOS and Linux, combined with its tendency to degrade endpoint performance. The platform is also known for generating a high volume of false positives, and its overall complexity makes it difficult to manage. Inconsistent customer support and a high, opaque cost structure further detract from its value.

‍

Protegrity

‍

Best For: Large enterprises in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, retail) that need persistent, field-level data protection and have diverse, cloud-native data estates.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Patented, highly scalable vaultless tokenization.
In-line proxy deployment for broad cloud-native platform support.
Field-level data protection (encryption, masking, anonymization).
Centralized policy management, auditing, and monitoring.

‍

Why It’s Good

‍

Protegrity is a top choice for organizations that require granular, persistent protection for specific data fields. Its patented vaultless tokenization is a key differentiator, offering a highly scalable way to protect data without the complexities of managing a traditional token vault. This makes it ideal for large, regulated enterprises that need to secure sensitive data at a very fine-grained level across their cloud and on-premise systems.

‍

Drawbacks

‍

Protegrity's most significant drawbacks are the severe performance bottlenecks that delay data access for weeks and the proprietary technology that creates major vendor lock-in. Its vaultless tokenization method raises security concerns, and its data classification features are considered weaker than competitors'. The platform is also complex to manage and has challenging integrations with modern DevOps environments.

‍

Top DSP Recommendations

‍

While the DSP market is crowded, the right choice often depends on your specific environment and primary challenge. We've broken down our top recommendations based on the most common and difficult use cases businesses face today.

Our overall top pick, DataStealth, stands out for its revolutionary in-line, agentless architecture. While many platforms build higher walls around your data, DataStealth takes a different approach: it protects the data regardless of where it flows through tokenization. By operating at the network layer to protect data in-flight, it eliminates the need for risky agents, code changes, or APIs, making it uniquely suited for complex, multi-faceted environments.

‍

Best DSP for Legacy Environments

‍

Winner: DataStealth

Securing legacy systems like mainframes is often considered an "impossible" task. These critical assets frequently hold vast amounts of sensitive data in cleartext, yet their age and complexity make modifications incredibly risky and expensive.

DataStealth solves this challenge by operating completely outside of the mainframe.

Zero-Change Integration: It deploys inline, using native protocols like TN3270 for terminal access and relevant database protocols for DB2. This requires no high-risk software installation or code alteration on the mainframe itself.
Real-Time Protection for Terminal Access: For legacy TN3270 terminal sessions that stream data directly to user screens, DataStealth applies Dynamic Data Masking (DDM) in real-time. It integrates with IAM systems like Active Directory to enforce role-based policies, ensuring users only see the data they are authorized to access.
In-Place Tokenization: DataStealth can tokenize sensitive data directly within the mainframe database without changing its format or location. Its vaulted tokenization generates format-preserving tokens that can pass legacy business logic rules (like Luhn checks for credit cards), ensuring system workflows continue uninterrupted.

A national telecommunications company successfully deployed DataStealth to secure its mission-critical mainframe application after other vendors "just ran away" upon hearing the word "mainframe."

‍

Best DSP for Hybrid Environments

‍

Winner: DataStealth

Hybrid environments, where data flows constantly between on-premises legacy systems and modern cloud applications, present a massive security challenge. Maintaining consistent security policies across these disparate systems is where most tools fail.

DataStealth excels as a security bridge for these data flows.

Controlled Replication: It intercepts replication flows from sources like a mainframe DB2 to downstream systems (e.g., a cloud-based Oracle database for fraud detection).
Consistent Cross-Environment Policies: It enforces data protection policies in transit, allowing the organization to leverage de-identified data for analytics without exposing cleartext information in the cloud.
Secure Data Boundaries: DataStealth can detokenize data from a source vault (like the mainframe's) and immediately re-tokenize it for a different vault associated with the target system. This ensures strict security boundaries are maintained between environments, reducing the risk of cross-environment data leakage.

‍

Best DSP for Cloud & SaaS Environments

‍

Winner: DataStealth

As businesses increasingly rely on third-party cloud, SaaS, and GenAI applications, the risk of "shadow data" exposure grows exponentially. DataStealth neutralizes this risk by securing data before it ever leaves your control.

In-Flight Data Neutralization: As live data flows through the DataStealth platform toward a cloud service, it instantly swaps sensitive information for secure tokens.
Eliminates Third-Party Risk: This process ensures that toxic, cleartext data never reaches the third-party application. Your applications function seamlessly while your databases and cloud services store only useless tokens, rendering any breach of the third-party environment inconsequential.

‍

Best DSP for Microsoft Environments

‍

Winner: DataStealth

For organizations that are deeply and almost exclusively invested in the Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystem, Microsoft Purview seems like the logical choice. Its key strength is its seamless, native integration across the entire Microsoft stack. It provides a unified data governance and compliance solution for Teams, Outlook, and Azure, making it easier to manage and protect data within that specific walled garden.

However, most enterprises operate in a heterogeneous reality. If your organization relies on a mix of Microsoft services, legacy systems, custom applications, and other cloud platforms, a vendor-specific tool like Purview creates security silos.

This is where DataStealth becomes the superior choice. It is completely agnostic, providing a unified security layer that protects data with consistent policies, regardless of the underlying application or infrastructure. It allows you to secure your entire data estate – from the mainframe to Microsoft 365 to AWS – with a single, non-disruptive platform.

‍

For PCI Compliance and Preventing Vendor Lock-In

‍

Winner: DataStealth

For any organization that processes payment data, achieving and maintaining PCI DSS compliance is a primary driver for adopting a DSP. DataStealth is purpose-built to solve this challenge while delivering significant strategic and financial benefits.

Reduces PCI Scope: It intercepts and tokenizes cardholder data before it ever enters your systems, which can remove entire applications from the scope of a PCI audit and dramatically reduce compliance costs. Loyalty provider Points used DataStealth to reduce the time spent on their PCI audits by half.
Meets new PCI DSS v4.0 Requirements: DataStealth is specifically designed to meet the new, stringent eSkimming requirements (6.4.3 and 11.6.1) by cataloging all scripts on payment pages in real-time and blocking any unauthorized or tampered scripts before they can execute in a consumer's browser.
Eliminates Vendor Lock-In: A common issue with payment processors is "token lock-in," where your customer payment data is held hostage in their proprietary token vault. DataStealth’s tokenization works with all payment processors. This gives you the ultimate negotiating leverage. One transportation enterprise leveraged their DataStealth deployment to turn a sudden 400% processing fee increase from their incumbent vendor into a 20% cost reduction by seamlessly switching to a new provider with zero customer disruption, no break fees, and no complex migration.

‍

Frequently Asked Questions About Data Security Platforms

‍

1. What is the difference between data security and cybersecurity?

‍

Cybersecurity is a broad field focused on protecting all digital assets, including networks, devices, and systems from cyberattacks. Data security is a specific subset of cybersecurity that focuses exclusively on protecting the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of digital data itself.

‍

2. How much does a Data Security Platform typically cost?

‍

Pricing varies widely. Endpoint-focused solutions can start around $60 per endpoint per year, while comprehensive enterprise platforms can cost anywhere from $30,000 to over $150,000 annually. Many vendors use quote-based pricing that depends on the size of your environment and the features you need.

‍

3. Can these platforms protect data in the cloud?

‍

Yes, all modern data security platforms are built to handle hybrid environments. They offer connectors and capabilities to discover, classify, and protect data stored in major cloud platforms like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). DataStealth, in particular, offers an agnostic approach where it sits in the line of data flows, allowing you to secure data across all of your cloud environments, regardless of cloud vendor.

‍

4. Do I still need other security tools if I have a data security platform?

‍

Yes. A data security platform is a central component of a security strategy, but it doesn't replace everything. You will still need fundamental tools like firewalls, endpoint antivirus (though some platforms like CrowdStrike bundle this), and identity and access management (IAM) solutions. The goal of a platform is to integrate with and enhance these other layers of security.

‍

About the Author: